What Does cs executive company law case studies pdf Mean?
What Does cs executive company law case studies pdf Mean?
Blog Article
“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any with the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din noticed firstly the deceased and after a ways they saw the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't indicate that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These types of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of very last witnessed.
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, Additionally it is a properly-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.
4. It's been noticed by this Court that there is often a delay of sooner or later inside the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained through the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness in the alleged event and the prosecution is depending on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession from the petitioners continues to be tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram occurred being the real brothers from the deceased but they did not react in the slightest degree into the confessional statements of the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, one particular after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not look much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is no explanation concerning why her arrest wasn't effected after making on the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on numerous events that extra judicial confession of the accused is really a weak kind of evidence which could possibly be manoeuvred via the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not arrive their way. The prosecution is likewise relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word regarding existence of some light in the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners collectively on the motorcycle at four.
The former means “guilty act” and also the latter means “guilty mind.” With the omission from the intention, the commission from the act by yourself is not sufficient to gain a conviction for that crime. This can be a simple principle that all law students are very well acquainted with.
prolonged period petitioner wasn't viewed as for promotion, meeting with the departmental promotion committee and evaluate the petitioner (Promotion)
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Specified the legal analysis on the topic issue, we have been with the view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally seem, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're topic to rules and regulations In the event the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case of your petitioners for promotion may be considered, however, we've been distinct in our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion website as the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, matter to availability of vacancy issue for the approval of your competent authority. Read more
whether even though granting promotion senior employees were regarded as for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)
after release from the jail he dropped interest to contest the moment appeal , appeal is dismissed (Criminal Jail Appeal )
This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a nearby electricity grid station on account of probable health risks and dangers.
How much sway case legislation holds may well vary by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances with the current case. To investigate this concept, take into account the following case law definition.
Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by law." It really is properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right into a healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there are not any specific provisions while in the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental regulation in Pakistan, it is important that the case set up the application of your precautionary principle where there is actually a danger to environmental rights, and emphasised the positive obligations from the State in protecting the right to the clean and healthy environment.
Stacy, a tenant within a duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he had not given her enough notice before raising her rent, citing a new state regulation that demands a minimum of ninety times’ notice. Martin argues that The brand new law applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.